Omalley Wealth Management Group, Llc

Omalley Wealth Management Group, Llc Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from Omalley Wealth Management Group, Llc, Financial Consultant, 3737 Woodland Avenue Ste 500, West Des Moines, IA.

I will share this every chance I can.
08/26/2026

I will share this every chance I can.

The Team Elayna Blood Drive is THIS SATURDAY!!

From Elayna's Mommy:
"I will never forget the day I took these pictures...
I had to borrow a wheelchair to bring Elayna in, as she was too exhausted to walk. She was quiet during the transfusion, but after... I almost couldn't believe the transformation... I watched her run and skip all the way out of the hospital. She spent the rest of this day playing games and being her silly self.

Elayna was able to be Elayna because of the kindness of strangers like YOU who donated blood and platelets, and that is the simple and beautiful truth.

In total, Elayna had *87* blood product transfusions during her fight against cancer. Without those transfusions she would not have been able to survive the treatment that she received. Not only that, but blood products helped her to feel more herself.

What an amazing gift you could be giving to a child like my best girl. Please help us fill our donor spots!" You can sign up at: https://tinyurl.com/teamelaynablooddrive

WHEN: Saturday, August 29th | 7:30 AM – 12:30 PM
WHERE: 5 Borough Bakery | 272 Hickman Rd, Waukee
ALSO AVAILABLE: There will be delicious baked goods for purchase as well as some AMAZING raffle baskets that you can enter to win. Even if you can't donate blood, please stop by and say hi! Even if you can't donate blood, please stop by and say hi! There will be something for everyone! 🥰

Learn more at: https://www.facebook.com/events/1684457969467572

Make your appointment to donate blood: https://tinyurl.com/teamelaynablooddrive

*Special thanks to Audrey - the bestie of Elayna's who organizes this event each year- first in her honor and now in her memory. đź’–

06/23/2026

First Trust
Monday Morning Outlook
New Leadership, New Direction

Brian S. Wesbury, Chief Economist
Robert Stein, Deputy Chief Economist
Date: 6/22/2026

The results of Kevin Warsh’s first official set of meetings on monetary policy as the Chairman of the Federal Reserve were like a breath of fresh air.

It wasn’t so much what he said, as what the Fed did not say, in particular in the official statement at the conclusion of the meetings, which was extremely short and to the point compared to the statements issued in recent decades under the leadership of Ben Bernanke, Janet Yellen, and Jerome Powell. Warsh’s philosophy on Fed communication seems to more closely resemble that of former long-time Chairman Alan Greenspan, who unfortunately passed away earlier today. Not Greenspan’s elegant and winding prose, but Greenspan’s unwillingness to hint strongly about what the Fed would do next.

Warsh doesn’t like the intense form of “forward guidance” that’s evolved at the Fed, where it treats the markets and the economy like some sort of young child that is always on the verge of a tantrum and needs to be placated, as if every shift must be communicated well ahead of time, and the Fed needs to ask for permission (“Please clean-up your room later today, is that OK?”) Instead, Warsh wants the Fed to make it clear it will pursue its definition of price stability, which we believe is the 2% inflation goal, and that’s that.

Warsh says he wants the financial markets to think about what’s going on in the economy, not how the Fed will react to what’s going on in the economy, which ought to be a secondary issue if the Fed is focused on price stability. Signaling his commitment to a new strategy, Warsh was the one “missing dot” from the dot plot that came out of the last week’s meeting, withholding his projection of the path of short-term interest rates in the years ahead, while all other Fed decisionmakers continued to participate.

We are also pleased that Warsh is having the Fed take a much closer look at the size of its balance sheet and the shift from the “scarce reserve” system the central bank used for many decades to a system of “ample reserves.” Don’t expect an imminent shift back to a scarce reserves system, but at least the Fed has now taken a first step in that direction.

Although Warsh was on the Fed as a regular member back during the Global Financial Crisis and supported the original version of Quantitative Easing at the time, he opposed later rounds of QE and has had some second thoughts about the policy tool. Hopefully he will recognize that it was not QE that saved the economy in 2008-09 or during COVID.

One way to tell how serious Warsh will be about changes and reforms at the Fed is to watch things other than monetary policy. The Fed has become too large an institution. It’s not just about its enormous balance sheet, it’s also about personnel. The Federal Reserve system employs about 25,000 workers. Yes, that includes bank regulators, check clearers, night watchmen, currency distribution systems, and researchers. But are all those researchers really focused on issues related to banking or monetary policy?

The Chicago Fed, in particular, seems gung-ho for a role in community development, including on issues of housing affordability. But every dollar that’s spent on this project, and others similar, is a dollar that instead would have gone to the US Treasury, reducing the need for future tax revenue. Ultimately, these are taxpayer funds being used to do what Fed officials want, without an appropriation by Congress.

One big problem is that former Chairman Jerome Powell is still a regular member of the Fed’s Board of Governors and we think he is unlikely to leave until at least late this year. While many say he’s sticking around due to potential legal issues involving cost overruns at the Fed, it might also be to see the outcome of the mid-term elections this Fall, because those elections may determine who Trump can appoint as a successor. If so, this is a purely political decision, which is exactly what Powell in the past has said he’s against.

Proud to help raise awareness (and funds) for Unravel Iowa in their fight against pediatric cancer.  Don't just be sorry...
06/23/2026

Proud to help raise awareness (and funds) for Unravel Iowa in their fight against pediatric cancer. Don't just be sorry, be active!

Huge thanks to Shane OMalley and his fellow riders from the local clubs that support Sons Of Silence Central 10wa, for an incredible Father's Day weekend fundraising ride!

34 motorcycles and 50+ riders covered 200 miles through Waukee, Winterset, Creston, Osceola, and Indianola, and they raised $1,500 for Unravel Iowa!!

05/04/2026

https://www.ftportfolios.com/Commentary/EconomicResearch/2026/5/4/chairman-in-name-only

Monday Morning Outlook
Chairman in Name Only

Brian S. Wesbury, Chief Economist
Robert Stein, Deputy Chief Economist
Date: 5/4/2026

Kevin Warsh wants to make some big shifts in monetary policy at the Fed. Unfortunately, unless and until soon-to-be former Chairman Jerome Powell steps down from his regular seat on the Federal Reserve Board, Warsh will be Chairman in Name Only.

One new policy Warsh wants is to shorten up the maturity structure of the Fed’s assets, getting it out of the business of holding longer-term securities. Another is to shift away from holding mortgage-backed securities and focus on Treasury securities only.

Even more important, Warsh wants the Fed to unwind Quantitative Easing, a policy he originally supported back in 2008-09 in the midst of the so-called Global Financial Crisis, but apparently later came to oppose – or at least oppose to the extent the Fed has made it a permanent feature of monetary policy rather than a temporary measure.

To successfully unwind QE it’s likely the Fed would also have to end the policy of paying banks interest on reserves, which means a Warsh chairmanship holds out the hope of eventually taking us back to a monetary regime where policy is implemented through scarce reserves rather than abundant reserves.

The problem is that even though Warsh will become Chairman soon, Powell has announced he will keep his board seat for at least the time being. Reports suggest he is only doing so temporarily but will depart that seat – which would open-up another position for President Trump to fill – as soon as the Administration commits with “finality and transparency” to ending the Justice Department’s investigation of the Fed.

But as long as Powell stays it will be tough for Warsh to shift policy at the Fed, either the long-term policies we outlined above or even shifts to short-term interest rates. The Fed bank presidents would still be the old Powell-approved presidents and likely with him on policy, not with Warsh. And the Powell faction at the Fed would still have four votes on the Board versus only three for Warsh.

Which brings us to another reason Powell may end up trying to stick around longer, maybe even all the way until January 31, 2028, when his term as a board member fully runs out. If Powell leaves before then and Trump replaces him on the board, the Trump-appointed board majority could then threaten to fire Fed bank presidents who oppose them. Yes, the courts have made it tough for Trump himself to fire board member Lisa Cook, but the courts would have a tougher time protecting bank presidents from a board majority.

In the meantime, Warsh, as official chairman, could try to speed Powell’s departure by making his life at the Fed uncomfortable: maybe take away his parking space and staff plus put his office in the basement. But the decision to leave would still be Powell’s until January 2028.

Based on Powell’s statements about trying to protect Fed “independence” from politics, preventing Trump from getting a board majority may be an ulterior motive for Powell to stay, which means the policy shifts supported by Warsh could be on the back burner for some time to come.

01/05/2026

https://www.ftportfolios.com/Commentary/EconomicResearch/2026/1/5/2026-forecast-still-wary

Monday Morning Outlook
2026 Forecast: Still Wary

Brian S. Wesbury, Chief Economist
Robert Stein, Deputy Chief Economist
Date: 1/5/2026

Last year, we thought economic growth would slow. Verdict: GDP data say we were wrong, employment data say we were right. Last year we thought the stock market would decline. Verdict: it did in March and April, sharply, but the S&P 500 ended the year with an impressive 16.4% gain. Overall, we’d say our negativity was unwarranted.

But to be clear, we are not pessimists. We expected – and continue to expect – amazing new technologies to roll out. Like always, we believe it is innovation that leads to higher standards of living. We are also very supportive of deregulation and fewer bureaucrats, policing crime and rooting out fraud, stopping illegal immigration and the drain on societal resources this seems to come with, keeping tax rates low, using tariffs in an attempt to reduce other countries’ trade barriers and unfair trade practices against the US, and cutting government spending in any way possible.

In other words, our pessimism was not driven by policies or the actual events of 2025. We did not worry about tariffs causing inflation or a collapse in global trade. Nor did we think closing the border would collapse consumption and growth. Moreover, we completely disagree with fears of “debasement” and the end of American Exceptionalism.

But two things did concern us last year. 1) COVID stimulus – from easy money and irresponsible deficit spending – was wearing off. No way should we be able to lockdown the economy and never have a recession. So far, the main price was higher inflation and more inequality and that price has been paid by those with lower incomes. The overall economy has continued to grow, but as stimulus faded we expected things to slow more than they have. And 2) The fact that by any measure the stock market was over-valued.
So, what about 2026?
First off, if anyone thinks they know exactly what will happen, they are kidding themselves. We woke up on January 3rd to the arrest of Nicolas Maduro, the self-proclaimed President of Venezuela. No one expected this, but it will have far-reaching effects on Russia, China, Cuba, the oil market, and global politics.

In November, the US will elect a new Congress which could have a massive impact on fiscal policy for years to come. The Federal Reserve will likely cut interest rates – our base case is two or three more 25 basis point cuts in 2026 – but with a new Fed leader coming in it could be more than that.

What we do know is that things will change. And many of those things will be positive for growth. The OBBBA restored 100% expensing for most business investment. And although the law didn’t cut marginal income tax rates, it did keep them from rising.
In addition, deregulation, the shrinking of the bureaucracy (January to November federal employment was down 271,000), and hundreds of billions of dollars in cuts to climate-related subsidies are removing wasteful spending and obstacles to productivity growth.

And while it is still too early to say with conviction, the actions against Maduro in Venezuela are likely to begin a process of pushing back against captured global institutions. We fully understand the arguments many are making about the Constitutionality of Trump’s arrest of Maduro. We won’t debate them other than to say Congress dithers while China, Russia, and Maduro thumbed their noses at the US. China and Russia actually like that Maduro was a criminal and dictator, they were supporting him. And they were doing it in our hemisphere with little pushback until now.

A global elite, who stand for open borders and “reimagining” the economy and support things like the “Great Reset,” are now on notice. Undermining freedom one institution at a time with seemingly free reign is over. At least for now. We see this as a good thing. Why? Because any reasonable person, looking at the history of our world, realizes that the founding of the US was one of the greatest things to ever happen. Freedom reduces the power of authoritarians and dictators don’t like this, but freedom is the greatest generator of wealth. It seems we are getting more of it. Which is appropriate in our country’s 250th year.

One worrisome development is a significant economic slowdown in Europe. We won’t go into all of it, but Germany and the UK are having economic problems. The German economy contracted from April to September, while the UK economy grew just 0.1% in Q3 (0.4% annualized). Much of this weakness is in manufacturing as electricity prices have soared because of climate-change-related energy policy.

Which brings us to the forecast for 2026. We could forecast just about any GDP growth rate imaginable. On the one hand we have all the ingredients of a boom – better tax environment, deregulation, less wasteful government spending, interest rate cuts, lower inflation, and an A.I. boom. On the other hand, the M2 money supply is only up 4.3% in the past year. With 2.5% inflation, that leaves just 1.8% for real GDP growth.

At the same time, the US has an extremely bifurcated economy with high income households benefiting from rising asset values and the wealth effect, while lower income households have been hammered by inflation. More and more purchases, even for meals out, are being paid for with Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL). Car lenders are stretching out payment time periods. Delinquencies for most loan-types have been rising and this month student loan collection processes will start up again.

If the stock market were to get hit, then wealth effect spending could drop at the same time lower income households are already hurting. This could subtract from consumption and slow growth sharply.

And that brings us to the stock market. Yes, we have been bearish on the market because our models (as well as every other model we know of) say the market is over-valued. This does not mean every stock is overvalued. It means the indexes are trading at multiples which historically are unsustainable. How did we get here? Since the bottom of the economy during COVID in 2020, corporate profits are up 96.2%, S&P 500 reported earnings are up 140% (they won at the expense of small business closed during COVID), while GDP is up just 55.8%. But the total return for the S&P 500 is up 189.5%! The stock market has outperformed earnings and economic growth and is trading at valuation metrics at the high end of the historical scale. Profits are also at a record level of GDP.

Many argue that AI and robots will boost profits significantly but the math on these predictions is somewhat suspect. We are not saying AI won’t change the world, it will, but the near-term projections seem over-rated.

Our capitalized profits model discounts earnings with the 10-year Treasury yield to calculate fair value. As of the third quarter, using a 4.0% 10-year Treasury yield and corporate profit growth of 10%, the S&P 500 is worth just 5,000. Our forecast for 2025 was a year-end target of 5,200. We know, we were way too low…the S&P 500 is trading at 6,900. In other words, we think the market is over-valued by roughly 25%.

This 25% figure can be affected dramatically by the level of the 10-year yield and profits. With the Fed cutting rates this year, a 10-year yield of 3.5% is not out of the picture. If that were to happen and profits also grew 10%, the market would still be overvalued by 17.5%. If AI boosted profit growth to 20% and the 10-year fell to 3.5%, the fair value of the S&P 500 would rise to 6,200. In other words, we can’t reasonably summon a forecast of a rising stock market in 2026.

Of course, with the list of positive events taking place on the monetary and fiscal front this year (and the potential for AI to lift profits faster than we think), we can’t just blindly follow the model right now. As a result, our forecast for year-end 2026 is 6,000.
Something to always remember though is that we invest in a market of stocks not just a stock market. Markets may struggle, but investments can do well. Be picky. Broaden out. Don’t concentrate investments and increase risk unnecessarily.

To conclude, we expect real GDP and inflation to both grow roughly 2% this year. That’s 4% overall growth and a slowdown from recent years. The 10-year should trade in a 3.5% to 4% range as the year progresses. Gold and silver have some fundamental forces pushing them higher, but the inflation they apparently see is unlikely to show up in the year ahead.

On political risks: if the GOP loses the House in November, reforms will be harder to push further. If tax rates remain low, while spending and regulation continue to be cut, the future is brighter. As a result, the election is a risk.

The bottom line is that good things are happening, but risks abound. Blindly buying the market because it keeps going up would be a mistake. Pay attention and be nimble. This coming year could be a roller coaster.

Address

3737 Woodland Avenue Ste 500
West Des Moines, IA
50266

Opening Hours

Monday 8am - 5pm
Tuesday 8am - 5pm
Wednesday 8am - 5pm
Thursday 8am - 5pm
Friday 8am - 5pm

Telephone

+5154214565

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Omalley Wealth Management Group, Llc posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share