What are the opening hours?

Monday 8am - 8pm Tuesday 8am - 8pm Wednesday 8am - 8pm Thursday 8am - 8pm Friday 8am - 8pm Sunday 8am - 8pm

Dino Tax Co, 2261 Northpark Drive, # 416, Houston, TX (2026)

From Brontosaurus-sized refunds to Velociraptor-speed service, our herd makes tax season a Jurassic breeze. While we’re absolutely serious about getting your taxes done right and saving you money, we want to break the ice in a humorous and approachable way. Our hope is that a dinosaur-themed tax company is striking enough that you won’t forget us. Our tax services include:
- Income Tax Preparation
- Previous Year(s) Unfiled Returns
- Settling IRS Debt or Payment Plans
- General Tax Consulting

06/18/2026

Tax-Free Meals and Lodging for Employees: Understanding IRC § 119 and Treasury Regulation § 1.119-1

Tax-Free Meals and Lodging for Employees: A Valuable but Often Misunderstood Employee Benefit

Many employees assume that if an employer provides free meals or housing, the value must automatically be included in taxable income. Surprisingly, the Internal Revenue Code contains a significant exception. Under certain circumstances, employees may receive employer-provided meals and lodging completely tax-free.

This exception is found in Internal Revenue Code § 119 and the Treasury Regulations interpreting it. While the rules are highly fact-specific, they can provide substantial tax savings for employees working in industries such as hospitality, agriculture, healthcare, education, property management, and remote operations.

The General Rule: Compensation Is Taxable

The Internal Revenue Code broadly defines taxable income.

IRC § 61(a) provides:

"Except as otherwise provided in this subtitle, gross income means all income from whatever source derived..."

Because employer-provided meals and housing generally constitute compensation, they would ordinarily be taxable unless a specific exclusion applies.

IRC § 119 provides one such exclusion.

Tax-Free Meals Furnished for the Convenience of the Employer

IRC § 119(a)(1) states:

"There shall be excluded from gross income of an employee the value of any meals furnished to him by his employer for the convenience of the employer, but only if the meals are furnished on the business premises of the employer."

Three primary requirements emerge:

1. The meals must be furnished by the employer.

2. The meals must be furnished for the convenience of the employer.

3. The meals must be furnished on the employer's business premises.

If any requirement is missing, the exclusion may fail.

What Does "Convenience of the Employer" Mean?

Treasury Regulation § 1.119-1(a)(2) explains:

"Meals furnished by an employer without charge to the employee will be regarded as furnished for the convenience of the employer if they are furnished for a substantial noncompensatory business reason of the employer."

The regulation goes on to provide examples.

Common qualifying situations include:

• Emergency personnel who must remain available during meal periods.

• Employees who must eat on-site because of limited meal periods.

• Workers stationed at remote facilities.

• Employees required to remain available for customers or operational needs.

Conversely, providing meals simply as additional compensation generally will not qualify.

Meals Must Be Furnished on the Business Premises

The exclusion is not available merely because the employer pays for meals.

Treasury Regulation § 1.119-1(c)(1) provides:

"The term 'business premises of the employer' generally means the place of employment of the employee."

For example:

• Hospital cafeterias serving on-duty medical staff may qualify.

• Meals served to apartment managers living and working on-site may qualify.

• Restaurant gift cards generally do not qualify.

The location requirement remains critical.

Tax-Free Lodging: Additional Requirements Apply

Lodging receives even stricter treatment.

IRC § 119(a)(2) states:

"There shall be excluded from gross income of an employee the value of any lodging furnished to him by his employer for the convenience of the employer, but only if—

(A) the employee is required to accept such lodging on the business premises of his employer as a condition of his employment."

To qualify, the lodging generally must satisfy three requirements:

1. Furnished on the employer's business premises.

2. Furnished for the employer's convenience.

3. Acceptance of the lodging is required as a condition of employment.

What Does "Condition of Employment" Mean?

Treasury Regulation § 1.119-1(b) explains:

"The employee is required to accept the lodging on the business premises of his employer as a condition of his employment if he is required to accept such lodging in order properly to perform the duties of his employment."

This rule often applies to:

• Apartment managers.

• Hotel managers.

• Ranch caretakers.

• Boarding school personnel.

• Camp directors.

• Remote facility operators.

The key question is not whether the employee wants the lodging, but whether living there is necessary to perform the job.

Common Example: Apartment Managers

A classic example involves an apartment manager who lives in an apartment provided by the owner.

If the manager must reside on-site to respond to tenant emergencies, supervise operations, and secure the property, the value of the apartment may qualify for exclusion under IRC § 119.

This can represent thousands of dollars of annual tax-free compensation.

Common Mistakes

Employers and employees frequently misunderstand these rules.

Common errors include:

Treating Housing Allowances as Tax-Free

Cash allowances paid to employees are generally taxable even if intended for housing.

IRC § 119 typically applies to lodging actually furnished, not cash reimbursements.

Assuming Remote Work Qualifies

Working remotely from home generally does not convert a personal residence into the employer's business premises.

Failing the Business Purpose Test

If meals or lodging are provided primarily as compensation rather than for a substantial business reason, the exclusion may be denied.

Documentation Matters

Employers should maintain records showing:

• Why meals or lodging are necessary.

• The business reasons supporting the arrangement.

• Employment policies requiring on-site residence when applicable.

• Job descriptions demonstrating operational necessity.

Proper documentation can become critical during an IRS examination.

Final Thoughts

Employer-provided meals and lodging can be valuable tax-free benefits when the requirements of IRC § 119 are satisfied. However, the rules are more restrictive than many taxpayers realize. The benefits must generally be furnished on the employer's business premises, serve a legitimate business purpose, and, in the case of lodging, often be required as a condition of employment.

Because the tax consequences can involve significant amounts of income, both employers and employees should carefully review the statutory requirements and Treasury Regulations before assuming that free meals or housing qualify for exclusion from income.

As with many areas of federal taxation, the details matter.

06/16/2026

Original Issue Discount (OID) Explained: Why You May Owe Tax on Interest You Never Received

When most people think about taxable interest income, they imagine receiving a check, a bank deposit, or a payment from a borrower. However, federal tax law contains a lesser-known concept called Original Issue Discount (OID) that can require taxpayers to recognize taxable interest income even when no cash has been received.

This rule frequently surprises investors, private lenders, sellers carrying back notes in real estate transactions, and family members involved in installment arrangements. Understanding OID can help taxpayers avoid unpleasant surprises when filing their tax returns.

What Is Original Issue Discount?

Original Issue Discount generally arises when a debt instrument is issued for less than its stated redemption price at maturity. The difference between the issue price and the amount ultimately payable is treated as interest that accrues over time.

The Internal Revenue Code provides:

"For purposes of this title, there shall be included in the gross income of the holder of any debt instrument having original issue discount an amount equal to the sum of the daily portions of the original issue discount for each day during the taxable year on which such holder held such debt instrument."

IRC § 1272(a)(1).

In simple terms, the IRS treats the discount as interest earned over the life of the loan, regardless of whether the lender actually receives cash during that year.

A Simple Example

Suppose Investor A purchases a five-year note for $90,000.

At maturity, the borrower must repay $100,000.

Although the note may not require periodic interest payments, the $10,000 difference is treated as interest income under the OID rules.

As a result, Investor A may be required to recognize a portion of that $10,000 as taxable income each year even though no money has yet been received.

Why Congress Created the Rule

Without OID rules, taxpayers could structure loans to defer taxable interest income for years while the economic benefit continued to accrue.

Congress responded by requiring lenders and investors to recognize the economic accrual of interest rather than waiting until cash is actually paid.

Treasury Regulations explain:

"Original issue discount is the excess of a debt instrument's stated redemption price at maturity over its issue price."

Treas. Reg. § 1.1273-1(a).

The purpose is to match taxable income more closely with the economic growth of the investment.

OID Is Common in Seller Financing

Many taxpayers assume OID only applies to Wall Street bonds. In reality, it frequently appears in private transactions.

Examples include:

• Seller-financed real estate sales;

• Business acquisitions involving promissory notes;

• Installment sales;

• Private loans between individuals;

• Notes issued at a discount;

• Certain estate and succession planning transactions.

A taxpayer who accepts a long-term note instead of cash may inadvertently create OID income.

OID Versus Stated Interest

Not every loan creates OID.

If a loan provides adequate stated interest that satisfies federal tax requirements, the lender typically reports the interest as it is paid or accrued under normal tax accounting rules.

OID generally becomes an issue when:

• Interest is deferred;

• Interest is artificially low;

• The debt is issued at a discount; or

• The repayment amount significantly exceeds the amount advanced.

The tax consequences can become particularly complex when OID interacts with the imputed-interest rules found elsewhere in the Internal Revenue Code.

The Daily Accrual Requirement

Unlike many tax concepts, OID does not wait until maturity.

Treasury Regulations provide detailed rules requiring discount to accrue over the life of the debt instrument.

As Treasury Regulation § 1.1272-1 explains, holders generally include OID in income using a constant-yield method that allocates income throughout the term of the obligation.

This means a taxpayer may owe income tax before receiving any cash payment whatsoever.

Common Taxpayer Mistakes

Several recurring mistakes appear in OID situations:

Ignoring Forms 1099-OID

Financial institutions frequently issue Form 1099-OID when OID income must be reported.

Failing to report amounts shown on the form can trigger IRS matching notices.

Assuming Cash Controls Taxability

Many taxpayers incorrectly believe income is not taxable until received.

OID is one of several exceptions where tax law requires recognition before payment.

Seller Financing Without Professional Advice

Real estate sellers often negotiate repayment terms without considering whether federal tax law will characterize part of the arrangement as accrued interest.

The result can be unexpected taxable income years before full payment is received.

What Happens If the Note Is Sold?

If a holder sells a debt instrument containing OID, additional tax complications may arise.

Part of the gain may be characterized as ordinary income attributable to accrued but previously unrecognized discount rather than capital gain.

Proper basis adjustments become critical when calculating gain or loss on disposition.

Final Thoughts

Original Issue Discount is one of those tax concepts that many taxpayers never encounter until it unexpectedly appears on a tax return. Unfortunately, the consequences can be significant because the rules often require taxpayers to recognize taxable interest income before receiving any cash.

Whether you are carrying back a note in a real estate transaction, investing in debt instruments, purchasing discounted bonds, or participating in a private financing arrangement, OID should be considered before the transaction is finalized.

The federal tax law governing original issue discount is highly technical, but the core principle is simple: the IRS generally taxes the economic accrual of interest, not merely the receipt of cash. Understanding that distinction can help taxpayers avoid costly surprises and plan transactions more effectively.

06/16/2026

Capital Loss Carryovers Explained: How IRC § 1212 Lets Taxpayers Use Investment Losses for Years to Come

Many taxpayers know that investment gains are taxable. Fewer understand what happens when investments lose money. Whether the loss comes from stocks, mutual funds, ETFs, cryptocurrency, or other capital assets, the Internal Revenue Code contains specific rules governing how and when those losses can be deducted.

The good news is that unused capital losses generally do not disappear. Under certain circumstances, they can be carried forward for years and used to offset future gains. Understanding these rules can help taxpayers avoid leaving valuable tax benefits on the table.

What Is a Capital Loss?

A capital loss occurs when a taxpayer sells a capital asset for less than its adjusted basis. Common examples include:

• Stocks

• Bonds

• Mutual funds

• ETFs

• Cryptocurrency

• Investment real estate (subject to special rules)

• Certain business investments

Capital losses are reported on Form 8949 and Schedule D of Form 1040.

The General Rule Under IRC § 1211

Congress limits the amount of capital losses that individuals may deduct against ordinary income.

IRC § 1211(b) provides:

"In the case of a taxpayer other than a corporation, losses from sales or exchanges of capital assets shall be allowed only to the extent of the gains from such sales or exchanges, plus (if such losses exceed such gains) the lower of—

(1) $3,000 ($1,500 in the case of a married individual filing a separate return), or

(2) the excess of such losses over such gains."

In plain English, taxpayers must first use capital losses against capital gains. If losses still remain, they may generally deduct up to $3,000 per year against ordinary income.

What Happens When Losses Exceed the Annual Limit?

This is where IRC § 1212 becomes important.

IRC § 1212(b)(1) provides:

"If a taxpayer other than a corporation has a net capital loss for any taxable year, the amount thereof shall be treated in the succeeding taxable year as a short-term capital loss."

The practical effect is significant. Unused losses generally carry forward indefinitely until they are fully utilized.

Example

Assume Sarah sells investments during 2026 and realizes:

• Capital gains: $5,000

• Capital losses: $40,000

Her net capital loss equals $35,000.

The tax treatment generally works as follows:

2026 Return

• $5,000 gain offset by losses

• Remaining loss: $35,000

• Deduct $3,000 against ordinary income

• Carry forward: $32,000

2027 Return

If Sarah has no capital gains in 2027:

• Deduct another $3,000

• Carry forward: $29,000

The process continues until the carryover is exhausted or future gains absorb it.

Treasury Regulations Confirm the Carryover Treatment

Treasury Regulation § 1.1212-1 explains that capital loss carryovers retain their character and are carried into future years according to the statutory framework established by IRC § 1212.

The regulations provide the computational framework used on Schedule D to determine available carryovers from prior years.

Why This Matters for Investors

Many taxpayers incorrectly assume investment losses are "lost" if they exceed the annual deduction limit.

In reality, large market declines may generate tax benefits that continue for many years.

This can be especially important for:

• Retirees with investment portfolios

• Cryptocurrency investors

• Active traders

• Individuals selling rental or investment property

• Taxpayers experiencing market downturns

A substantial loss today may reduce taxes on future gains years from now.

Capital Loss Carryovers and Death

One often-overlooked rule is that capital loss carryovers generally do not survive the taxpayer's death.

If a taxpayer dies with unused capital loss carryovers, those carryovers generally expire and cannot be transferred to heirs.

As a result, taxpayers with large carryovers may wish to discuss tax-planning strategies with a qualified tax professional.

Common Mistakes

Taxpayers frequently make the following errors:

Losing Track of Carryovers

Carryovers must generally be calculated and reported each year. Failure to preserve prior-year records can create problems later.

Ignoring Prior-Year Returns

A taxpayer may have a valuable capital loss carryover from years earlier that continues to reduce future taxes.

Assuming Cryptocurrency Losses Are Different

For federal income tax purposes, cryptocurrency is generally treated as property. Capital loss rules often apply in much the same way they do for stocks and other investments.

Forgetting State Tax Differences

Some states follow federal capital loss rules closely, while others have significant differences.

Final Thoughts

Capital losses may feel painful when investments decline, but the tax code provides a measure of relief. Under IRC §§ 1211 and 1212, taxpayers can generally use losses to offset gains and, when losses exceed annual limits, carry unused amounts forward into future years.

For taxpayers with significant investment losses, understanding capital loss carryovers can produce meaningful tax savings for years to come. Careful recordkeeping and proper Schedule D reporting are essential to ensure these valuable tax attributes are preserved and utilized correctly.

06/16/2026

IRC § 1341 and the Claim of Right Doctrine: When You Have to Pay Back Income You Already Paid Tax On

Understanding One of the Most Overlooked Tax Relief Provisions in the Internal Revenue Code

Most taxpayers understand that income is taxable when received. However, what happens if you receive money, report it as income, pay tax on it, and then later discover you must return some or all of that money?

At first glance, this appears unfair. After all, you already paid tax on funds that you ultimately did not keep. Congress recognized this problem and enacted Internal Revenue Code § 1341, commonly known as the "Claim of Right" provision.

This little-known tax rule can provide significant relief when a taxpayer is required to repay previously taxed income.

The Claim of Right Doctrine

The claim of right doctrine originates from court decisions holding that income is generally taxable when a taxpayer receives it under a claim of right and without restrictions on its use.

Treasury Regulation § 1.451-2(a) provides:

"Income although not actually reduced to a taxpayer's possession is constructively received by him in the taxable year during which it is credited to his account, set apart for him, or otherwise made available so that he may draw upon it at any time."

Similarly, taxpayers generally must report income when they receive money and have unrestricted use of it, even if a dispute later arises regarding their entitlement to retain the funds.

This can create an inequitable result when money is subsequently repaid.

Congress Responds with IRC § 1341

To address this issue, Congress enacted IRC § 1341.

The statute provides, in relevant part:

"If—

(1) an item was included in gross income for a prior taxable year because it appeared that the taxpayer had an unrestricted right to such item;

(2) a deduction is allowable for the taxable year because it was established after the close of such prior taxable year that the taxpayer did not have an unrestricted right to such item or to a portion of such item; and

(3) the amount of such deduction exceeds $3,000,

then the tax imposed by this chapter for the taxable year shall be the lesser of" the tax computed under alternative methods described in the statute.

See IRC § 1341(a).

In plain English, the provision allows a taxpayer who repays more than $3,000 of previously taxed income to potentially recover the tax benefit associated with the original inclusion.

How the Tax Relief Works

When IRC § 1341 applies, the taxpayer generally calculates tax under two methods:

Method One: Take a Deduction

The taxpayer deducts the repayment amount in the year it is repaid.

Method Two: Compute a Tax Credit

The taxpayer recalculates what the prior year's tax would have been had the income never been reported and then claims a credit for the difference.

The taxpayer is generally allowed to use whichever method results in the lower current-year tax liability.

This flexibility can create substantial tax savings.

Common Real-World Examples

Employee Bonus Repayments

An executive receives a $50,000 performance bonus in 2024 and pays income tax on it.

In 2026, the employer discovers accounting irregularities and requires repayment of the bonus under a clawback provision.

IRC § 1341 may allow the executive to recover part of the tax previously paid on the bonus.

Litigation Recoveries

A plaintiff receives a judgment and reports the proceeds as income.

Several years later, an appellate court reverses the judgment and the plaintiff must return the funds.

The claim of right rules may apply.

Commissions and Compensation

Sales representatives sometimes receive commissions that later must be refunded due to canceled transactions or contractual disputes.

When the repayment exceeds $3,000, IRC § 1341 should be examined carefully.

Government Benefit Overpayments

Recipients of certain government benefits occasionally receive overpayments that must be repaid years later.

Depending on the facts, claim of right relief may be available.

Situations Where IRC § 1341 Does Not Apply

Not every repayment qualifies.

Common disqualifying situations include:

• Capital losses rather than ordinary income repayments.

• Repayments of less than $3,000.

• Situations where the taxpayer never had an apparent unrestricted right to the funds.

• Transactions involving mere valuation changes or investment losses.

Courts have repeatedly emphasized that the taxpayer must have reasonably appeared entitled to the funds when originally received.

Interaction with Treasury Regulations

Treasury Regulation § 1.1341-1(a) explains:

"Section 1341 provides relief in certain cases where an item was included in gross income in a prior taxable year because it appeared that the taxpayer had an unrestricted right to such item."

The regulation further clarifies that the provision applies only where a deduction is otherwise allowable because the taxpayer later determines that the prior unrestricted right did not actually exist.

Why This Provision Matters

Many taxpayers simply claim a deduction when income is repaid. However, the deduction alone may provide less tax relief than a § 1341 credit, particularly if tax rates changed between years.

For high-income taxpayers, executives subject to compensation clawbacks, business owners, and professionals involved in litigation, the difference can be substantial.

Unfortunately, many taxpayers and even some preparers overlook IRC § 1341 entirely.

Final Thoughts

The federal income tax system generally taxes income when received. However, Congress recognized that fairness sometimes requires relief when taxpayers are later forced to return money they previously believed they were entitled to keep.

IRC § 1341 serves as an important corrective mechanism by allowing eligible taxpayers to recover taxes paid on income they ultimately did not retain.

If you have repaid compensation, commissions, litigation proceeds, or other income previously reported on a tax return, it may be worthwhile to determine whether the Claim of Right provisions of IRC § 1341 can reduce your current tax liability or generate a valuable tax credit.

Because the calculations can be complex and often require reconstructing prior-year tax returns, taxpayers should consult a qualified tax professional before filing.

06/12/2026

Employer-Provided Dependent Care Assistance Programs: How IRC § 129 Lets Working Parents Receive Tax-Free Benefits

Understanding the Tax Advantages of Employer Childcare Benefits

For many working parents, childcare is one of the largest household expenses. What many taxpayers do not realize is that the Internal Revenue Code provides a mechanism through which employers can help employees pay for certain childcare expenses on a tax-favored basis.

Through a Dependent Care Assistance Program ("DCAP"), qualifying benefits may be excluded from an employee's taxable income under Internal Revenue Code ("IRC") § 129. When properly structured, these benefits can reduce federal income taxes, Social Security taxes, and Medicare taxes while helping employees manage the substantial costs of caring for children and other qualifying dependents.

This article explains how IRC § 129 works, who qualifies, and some of the common tax traps that taxpayers should avoid.

What Is a Dependent Care Assistance Program?

IRC § 129(a)(2)(A) generally provides that certain employer-provided dependent care assistance may be excluded from an employee's gross income.

The statute states:

"Gross income of an employee does not include amounts paid or incurred by the employer for dependent care assistance provided to such employee if the assistance is furnished pursuant to a dependent care assistance program."

The exclusion applies only if numerous statutory requirements are satisfied.

What Expenses Qualify?

The dependent care assistance must generally be provided so that the employee (and spouse, if married) can work or actively look for work.

Treasury Regulation § 1.21-1 defines employment-related expenses in a manner that generally includes expenses for the care of a qualifying individual that enable the taxpayer to be gainfully employed.

Common examples include:

• Daycare expenses;

• Licensed childcare providers;

• Before-school and after-school care programs;

• Summer day camps;

• Adult day care for certain incapacitated dependents.

However, not all childcare expenses qualify.

Generally, the following do not qualify:

• Overnight camps;

• School tuition for kindergarten and higher grades;

• Payments to certain related persons;

• Expenses that are not work-related.

Who Is a Qualifying Individual?

IRC § 21(b)(1) generally identifies qualifying individuals for dependent care purposes.

These typically include:

• A child under age 13 who is a dependent of the taxpayer;

• A spouse who is physically or mentally incapable of self-care;

• Certain dependents who are physically or mentally incapable of self-care.

The dependent care assistance exclusion and the dependent care credit often rely upon similar definitions of qualifying individuals.

Annual Exclusion Limits

One of the most important limitations involves the maximum amount that may be excluded from income.

IRC § 129(a)(2)(A) generally limits the annual exclusion to:

• $5,000 for married taxpayers filing jointly and most unmarried taxpayers; or

• $2,500 for married taxpayers filing separately.

Amounts exceeding these limits generally become taxable wages.

Employees frequently encounter these limits through flexible spending accounts (FSAs) offered by their employers.

Nondiscrimination Requirements

Congress intended these programs to benefit employees broadly rather than primarily executives and owners.

Accordingly, IRC § 129(d) imposes several nondiscrimination requirements.

For example, a dependent care assistance program generally may not discriminate in favor of highly compensated employees regarding eligibility or benefits.

If the plan fails applicable nondiscrimination testing, highly compensated employees may lose some or all of the exclusion.

This is particularly important for closely held businesses where owners and key employees participate in the plan.

Interaction With the Child and Dependent Care Credit

A common source of confusion is the interaction between a dependent care FSA and the Child and Dependent Care Credit.

Taxpayers generally cannot receive a double tax benefit for the same expense.

IRC § 21(c) effectively requires qualifying expenses used for the exclusion under IRC § 129 to reduce the expenses available for purposes of claiming the dependent care credit.

In practical terms, taxpayers must coordinate the two benefits when preparing their tax returns.

Reporting Requirements

Employer-provided dependent care assistance is generally reported on Form W-2.

The amount of dependent care benefits is typically disclosed in Box 10 of Form W-2.

Even though qualifying benefits may be excluded from taxable income, employees generally must complete Form 2441 when filing their federal income tax returns.

Form 2441 helps determine:

• Whether the exclusion applies;

• Whether any portion becomes taxable;

• Whether any additional dependent care credit is available.

Common Tax Mistakes

Taxpayers frequently encounter problems when:

1. Assuming All Childcare Expenses Qualify

Many parents mistakenly believe school tuition or overnight camp costs qualify. In many cases, they do not.

2. Double-Dipping

Expenses used to obtain tax-free treatment under a dependent care FSA generally cannot also be used to generate a dependent care credit.

3. Exceeding Annual Limits

Amounts above statutory limits may become taxable compensation.

4. Ignoring Work-Related Requirements

The care must generally enable the taxpayer to work or seek employment.

Why This Matters

Childcare costs continue to rise across the United States. For many families, employer-sponsored dependent care assistance can produce meaningful tax savings while making childcare more affordable.

Understanding the requirements of IRC § 129 can help taxpayers maximize available tax benefits and avoid costly filing errors.

As with many areas of tax law, the details matter. Proper coordination between dependent care assistance programs, flexible spending accounts, and the Child and Dependent Care Credit can significantly affect a family's overall tax liability.

Conclusion

Employer-provided dependent care assistance remains one of the most valuable fringe benefits available to working families. When structured properly, these programs allow employees to exclude qualifying childcare benefits from taxable income while helping employers provide meaningful support to their workforce.

Taxpayers considering participation in a dependent care assistance program should carefully review the applicable requirements under IRC §§ 21 and 129 and consult a qualified tax professional regarding their specific circumstances.

Address

2261 Northpark Drive, # 416
Houston, TX
77339

Opening Hours

Monday	8am - 8pm
Tuesday	8am - 8pm
Wednesday	8am - 8pm
Thursday	8am - 8pm
Friday	8am - 8pm
Sunday	8am - 8pm

Website

http://www.dinotaxco.com/

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Dino Tax Co posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Dino Tax Co:

Dino Tax Co

06/18/2026

06/16/2026

06/16/2026

06/16/2026

06/12/2026

Address

Opening Hours

Website

Alerts

Contact The Business

Shortcuts

Share

Category