06/11/2026
Not All Interests Are Created Equal: The Case for Minority Discounts in Estate and Gift Planning
A business owner with a $10 million company doesn’t necessarily have a $4 million estate planning value if they’re transferring a 40 percent interest. Once valuation discounts are properly applied, the taxable value of that interest can be meaningfully and defensibly lower. That gap between proportional value and fair market value is one of the reasons minority interest transfers remain such an important estate and gift planning tool.
Why a Minority Interest Is Worth Less
Imagine owning 20 percent of a private company. You can’t force a distribution. You can’t replace management. You can’t sell the company or easily compel a buyout of your interest. If the majority owner decides to reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, you wait. If she sets her own compensation at a level that reduces profitability, you absorb it. Most buyers would pay less for that interest than for a controlling stake, and that’s the economic reality that valuation discounts are designed to reflect.
There are two distinct adjustments involved. The discount for lack of control (DLOC) captures the absence of those decision-making rights. The discount for lack of marketability (DLOM) reflects the illiquidity of the interest itself. There’s no ready market for a fractional stake in a private company, and finding a willing buyer takes time and cost.
Although these concepts are often considered to be lumped together as a “minority discount,” they measure different economic limitations, and we analyze them separately.
Operating Companies: Control Lives in the Cash Flows
For minority (aka noncontrolling) interests in operating companies, we typically don’t apply a separate DLOC. Instead, we build the control adjustment into the income approach itself.
Consider a founder-operated manufacturing business in which a 20 percent shareholder may have no ability to influence compensation, the timing of capital expenditures, or dividend policy. Those limitations are real, but they’re reflected in cash flow projections based on what a minority holder would actually receive, not what a controlling owner could extract. The result of this approach is a minority, marketable value, to which only a DLOM is then applied.
Applying a separate DLOC on top of cash flows already built on a minority basis risks double-counting the same adjustment, which can draw IRS scrutiny.
Property-Holding Entities: A Different Starting Point
The analysis works differently for real estate LLCs, family limited partnerships, and investment holding companies.
Consider a family LLC that owns an apartment building. A 25 percent member cannot force a sale, refinance the property, or control distributions. If a controlling member decides not to sell for ten years, the minority owner may have to wait. Those limitations are significant, and they affect value.
Because these entities are often valued using net asset value (based on the appraised value of the real estate and/or other investments), which represents a control-level indication of value, a discrete DLOC is typically applied before applying a DLOM.
In these situations, the governing documents, particularly provisions relating to management rights, distributions, and transfer restrictions, become critical to the analysis.
What the IRS Is Watching
Valuation discounts remain a frequent area of IRS scrutiny.
For operating companies, examiners often focus on whether the valuation already reflects minority-level economics. For holding companies, they examine whether the discounts are supported by the governing documents and empirical market evidence.
A parent transferring a 30 percent interest in a family LLC isn’t transferring 30 percent of control. The valuation should reflect that economic reality.
The Bottom Line
A minority interest is worth less than a proportional slice of the whole company, and that’s exactly why valuation matters in estate and gift planning. For business owners considering gifts, estate planning transfers, or succession strategies, how that interest will be valued deserves as much attention as the structure of the transfer itself.
Key Takeaways for Advisors
• A minority interest is often worth less than its proportional share of the overall business.
• DLOC and DLOM measure different economic limitations and are analyzed separately.
• For property-holding entities, a discrete DLOC is appropriate because net asset value is a control-level starting point.
• For property-holding entities, a discrete DLOC is frequently appropriate because net asset value represents a control-level indication of value.
• The governing documents drive discount magnitude — transfer restrictions, distribution rights, and management provisions are where the analysis begins.
• A well-supported appraisal remains essential when discounts are expected to withstand IRS scrutiny.
Minority interest discounts are technically defensible when they’re analytically grounded — and that’s where credentials matter. At Central Pacific Valuation, Shannon Lowther (CFA, ASA, ABV) and our team bring the professional rigor these engagements require. Our appraisals are USPAP-compliant, prepared by credentialed appraisers, and built to hold up under IRS scrutiny.
If you’re advising a client on a gift, estate transfer, or succession involving a minority interest, we’d welcome the conversation. Contact us to discuss your engagement.