03/07/2026
Parting Company: When Your Buy-Sell Agreement Fails
Buy-sell agreements are often signed and forgotten—until a death, retirement, or ownership dispute puts the valuation language to the test. At that point, the appraisal provision becomes one of the most important economic terms in the entire document. Unfortunately, many agreements contain ambiguity that leads to delays, unexpected value conclusions, or litigation. A periodic review of these provisions, especially after significant business or ownership changes, can prevent costly surprises.
Fair Value Is Not Fair Market Value
The most common problem is the failure to clearly define the standard of value. “Fair value” and “fair market value” are not interchangeable, and the difference can be significant. Fair market value generally assumes a hypothetical willing buyer and seller and often incorporates discounts. Fair value in shareholder disputes may exclude them. If the agreement uses shorthand without a definition, the parties may end up litigating terminology before they ever reach the valuation. Clarity up front can prevent that.
Outdated Formula Pricing
Fixed-price provisions, often based on last year’s book value or a multiple of earnings, can work when a company is young and simple. The problem is that formulas are rarely revisited, and businesses rarely stay simple. As a company adds real estate, changes its capital structure, or grows substantially, the formula drifts further from economic reality with every passing year.
When a triggering event finally arrives, the price the formula produces can shock one or both parties. One of our engagements involved an exiting minority shareholder, a book-value formula, and no appraisal process. We delivered our valuation. Five years later, the matter is still unresolved. Some agreements don’t just fail at the triggering event—they keep failing long after it.
Getting a periodic, independent valuation—obtained while the business relationship is intact and stakes are low—gives owners a realistic price anchor and a shared frame of reference before emotions and financial pressure enter the room.
Unclear Appraisal Mechanics
Even when an agreement calls for an appraisal, the process is often underdeveloped. Key questions should be addressed in advance: the standard and level of value, the valuation date, whether discounts apply to non-controlling interests (an often overlooked provision), and who engages the valuation firm. Without that guidance, key provisions are left open to interpretation, and the conclusion becomes vulnerable to challenge. A well-drafted provision keeps the focus on valuation, not contract interpretation.
Multi-Entity Structures and Non-Operating Assets
Many closely held businesses now operate through multiple entities, with real estate or excess cash held outside the operating company. This structure is especially common in Central California agricultural operations. Older agreements often do not specify whether those assets are included in the buyout price or how related-party arrangements are treated. If the agreement is silent, the result may not reflect the owners’ original intent, particularly where estate planning has introduced non-controlling interests across entities.
Dispute-Resolution Framework
Finally, the agreement should define a practical way to resolve differences. Many agreements we’ve seen address it through a structured three-appraiser process. While that’s an effective mechanism, the time, cost, and effort involved can be substantial. In the last three-appraiser process we participated in, the process took several months, involved both real estate and business appraisers, and required significant coordination between the parties’ respective counsel and the appraisers. Alternatively, a single jointly retained appraiser or another binding mechanism can significantly streamline the process and mitigate relationship strain when a triggering event occurs.
A Proactive Opportunity
Buy-sell agreements should not be static documents. Reviewing the valuation provisions after major business, ownership, or structural changes can help ensure the agreement yields a defensible result when needed most.
• Define the standard of value explicitly
• Update or replace formula pricing
• Obtain periodic independent valuations
• Specify the valuation date, level of value, and discount treatment
• Address multi-entity structures and non-operating assets
• Include a clear dispute-resolution mechanism
• Revisit the agreement after significant changes in the business