The Affluent Link

The Affluent Link Victor Liew is Managing Director of a Wealth Advisory agency attached to Manulife Investment Management Bhd. We always place the client’s interests first.

Guiding Malaysia’s professionals through the Shadow Inflation era — to protect wealth that truly lasts | Wealth Beyond Illusions™ | Strategy - Clarity - Freedom Wealth advisory is the business of advising and recommending solutions for protecting an individual’s family and their assets, and to start investing for growth and planning for the future. As our client, your wealth solutions are tailore

d for your unique situation. There’s no one size fits all here. Part of being an Affluent Link is helping others build a career. Would you be interested in a wealth advisory career? For new graduates and anyone in between jobs and searching for business opportunities, sales in financial solutions can either be the highest paying hard work or the lowest paying easy work. This needs repeating. Highest paying hard work or lowest paying easy work. And just as important, do you want to make a powerful positive difference in people’s lives? To be in this career for the right reasons means at the end of your working day you will feel happy in educating someone or a family take the step to do the right thing with their money. We can’t stress enough the importance. You’ve helped someone make the smart decision to protect their family and assets and to start planning and investing for their future. And there’s more. With our Centre for Success, you will have a career path. You are mentored to start your own business. How cool is that? So what do you have to do to achieve all this? Message us. Bring along the right attitude for work. The right attitude to help others. We will be there for you.

This morning’s market news should make one thing very clear. A retirement portfolio cannot be built on comfort, headline...
12/06/2026

This morning’s market news should make one thing very clear. A retirement portfolio cannot be built on comfort, headlines or favourite stocks. When oil inventories fall, manufacturers lose orders and a hot Bursa counter collapses after a hype-driven run, the issue is no longer market noise. It is portfolio design.

Singapore’s oil product inventories have fallen to near 13-year lows. Malaysian manufacturers are already warning that West Asia disruptions are creating lasting commercial damage, not just temporary cost pressure. That means inflation, freight cost, energy cost and margin pressure can quietly move from the news page into your household budget and investment statement.

Then you have the other side of the market. Tanco rallied more than 600% since 2024, then suffered repeated limit-down moves and wiped out billions in market value from its peak. This is what happens when investors confuse a theme with a strategy. Data centre, AI, port, energy, property — the label may change, but the behaviour is usually the same.

For a retiree or soon-to-retire investor with RM2 million to RM10 million, the question is not whether Bursa Malaysia has opportunities. Of course it does. The question is whether your portfolio can survive inflation shocks, earnings shocks, currency shocks, liquidity shocks and your own need for monthly income.

That is where proper unit trust portfolio construction still has a role. Not because unit trusts are magic. They are not. But a well-built portfolio can spread exposure across asset classes, regions, currencies, sectors and fund managers, instead of forcing your retirement capital to depend on one hot story or one domestic market.

The right question is not, “Which fund is hot now?”

The right question is, “Which part of my money must provide liquidity, which part must create income, and which part can still take growth risk?”

If your EPF, FD, property cash and unit trusts are all sitting together without clear jobs, you do not have a retirement portfolio. You have a pile of assets waiting to be tested by the next crisis.

The news today is not really about takaful, fuel subsidies or the ringgit. It is about one question: can your retirement...
11/06/2026

The news today is not really about takaful, fuel subsidies or the ringgit. It is about one question: can your retirement income survive costs you do not control? The Edge today reported that selected takaful operators are preparing for the July 1 pilot launch of the medical and health insurance and takaful base plan. That sounds positive, and it is. But the more important message is not the product launch. It is the reason behind it: medical claims, healthcare inflation and rising premiums have become serious enough that the system needs reform.

At the same time, Malaysia is managing fuel subsidy pressure, ringgit volatility and the impact of energy disruption from the Iran conflict. Even if the country remains resilient, your household may not be. A retiree does not spend GDP growth. A retiree spends from bank accounts, EPF withdrawals, FD interest, rental income and investment distributions.

This is why I keep telling retirees and soon-to-retire professionals not to confuse asset size with retirement strength. RM2 million, RM5 million or RM10 million can still be badly structured if it is not assigned to the right jobs: liquidity, income, protection and long-term growth.

The other trap is chasing the headline. AI debt, data centres, glove rebounds, commodity swings and short-term stock excitement will always look tempting. But a retirement portfolio is not supposed to behave like a casino ticket. It is supposed to replace your salary, defend your lifestyle and keep you from making desperate decisions at the wrong time.

If you are within five years of retirement, do not just ask whether your investments can grow. Do not be complacent if most of your wealth is still sitting in EPF, FD, property or scattered unit trusts.

Stress test before it's too late. Check if your portfolio can replace your salary, protect you and survive the next 20 years of rising costs.

That is the real retirement test.

HNW retirees do not usually fail because they have no assets. They fail because their assets have no assigned jobs. A re...
08/06/2026

HNW retirees do not usually fail because they have no assets. They fail because their assets have no assigned jobs. A retiree with RM5 million to RM10 million in EPF, cash and property can still get retirement wrong. That sounds strange only to people who confuse net worth with income design. A large balance gives comfort, but comfort is not the same as control.

More often I see this problem among successful Malaysians because they have done the hard part already. They worked for decades, bought property, built EPF, kept cash, renewed fixed deposits and avoided obvious stupidity. On paper, they look secure. In practice, many still do not know how much they can safely spend every month without weakening the next 20 to 30 years.

That is the part the EPF statement does not answer.

RM5 million looks impressive until it has to pay for two households, adult children, medical bills, insurance premiums, home repairs, inflation and lifestyle continuity. RM5 million can still be poorly structured if too much is idle, too much is trapped in property, too much sits in fixed deposit, and too little is designed to produce regulated monthly income. RM10 million still leaks badly when every withdrawal is emotional, unplanned and treated as “temporary”.

This is why HNW retirees should stop asking only, “How much do I have?”

The better question is: “Which part of my wealth is paying monthly income, which part is protected for medical and emergency use, and which part is still growing because retirement may last longer than expected?”

Property sellers face this even more sharply. The cheque looks powerful on completion day. But once the proceeds enter the bank account, the claims begin. One child needs help. A renovation looks reasonable. A medical bill arrives. A relative asks for a loan. The retiree upgrades lifestyle because the balance looks large. No single decision looks dangerous. The damage happens through repeated leakage.

That is why a three-bucket retirement system matters.

One bucket for monthly spending. One bucket for emergency and medical reserve. One bucket for long-term income and growth. Simple, but not simplistic. The point is to stop every ringgit from sitting in the same vague pile called “retirement money”.

For HNW retirees, the danger is not always running out of money quickly. The danger is losing control slowly. Too much capital, too little structure. Too many assets, no clear paycheque. Too much confidence, not enough withdrawal discipline.

EPF, FD, cash, property, insurance and unit trust holdings should not be admired separately. They must be forced to work together. Otherwise, you may retire asset-rich, cash-rich, and still income-weak.

Within five years of retirement, the review is not optional. It is the difference between having a large number and having a retirement paycheque.

Review your EPF, cash, FD, property, insurance and unit trust holdings can be structured into a proper monthly retirement income plan.

Some retirees are going to learn a very expensive lesson from this trust-company issue. They are about to discover that ...
05/06/2026

Some retirees are going to learn a very expensive lesson from this trust-company issue. They are about to discover that the word “trust” does not automatically mean safe.

The Securities Commission has now drawn a clearer line between a normal trust business and a trust structure that behaves like an investment product. That distinction matters because many retirees do not read the structure. They read the promised return.

And when the promised return is 10%, 11% or 12% per annum, many people stop asking the correct question.

The question is not, “Is this called a trust?”

The question is, “Who is actually managing the money, what is being invested in, how is the return generated, and who regulates that activity?”

That is where the danger sits.

A proper estate trust is usually about succession, beneficiaries, administration and continuity. An investment-led trust is different. When money is pooled, invested, projected and marketed with returns, the retiree is no longer looking at simple estate planning. He is looking at an investment arrangement wearing trust clothing.

This is where many cash-rich retirees are vulnerable.

They sell a property. They receive EPF money. They retire with RM1 million, RM2 million or RM5 million and suddenly every smooth presenter has a solution for “safe monthly income.” The retiree wants comfort. The promoter sells certainty.

But certainty is not the same as safety.

The SC’s move is important because it forces the market to answer a basic question: are you merely administering a trust, or are you running an investment activity?

For retirees, I would not wait for every grey area to be resolved. I would review the structure now. I would check the licence. I would ask where the return comes from. I would ask whether the assets are capital market products, property, FD, gold, insurance-linked structures or something else.

And I would be very careful with any arrangement where the return sounds cleaner than the explanation.

Retirement money should not be placed somewhere simply because the brochure sounds stable. It must be structured around liquidity, monthly income, medical reserves, inflation and regulated investment access.

For retirees looking for alternatives to high-return trust arrangements, contact me directly. The goal is not to chase the biggest promised number. The goal is to build income in a regulated, explainable and reviewable way.

RM2 million to RM10 million can look impressive before retirement. It gives comfort, status and the feeling that the big...
03/06/2026

RM2 million to RM10 million can look impressive before retirement. It gives comfort, status and the feeling that the big decisions are already settled. But on the verge of retirement, the question changes. It is no longer “How much do I have?” It is “What exactly will pay me every month, in what currency, under what conditions, and for how long?”

This is where many high-net-worth Malaysians become careless. EPF looks safe. Fixed deposit looks safe. Property looks solid. Local shares and familiar unit trusts feel understandable. But when you map everything properly, a large portion of the family wealth may still be tied to the same country, same currency, same banking system, same property cycle and same domestic policy environment.

That is not real diversification. That is concentration wearing a nice shirt.

The Edge reported today that Malaysia faces a proposed 10% US duty over alleged failure to curb forced-labour imports. More importantly, Malaysia’s exports to the US are heavily concentrated. Electrical and electronics alone made up RM120.1 billion, or 60.4% of Malaysia’s exports to the US in 2024.

A retiree does not need to own a factory to feel that. Trade pressure can affect market earnings, confidence, the ringgit, employment, government revenue and investment flows. When your EPF, property, cashflow, business history and local investments all sit inside the same ecosystem, external shocks are not external anymore.

The same issue appears in energy. Malaysia wants more renewable energy, more data centres, more grid capacity and more transition investment. That may be necessary, but it is not free. Higher financing cost, regulatory uncertainty, grid spending and electricity demand eventually land somewhere. Usually, the household and the business owner discover it later through bills, margins and inflation.

This is why retirement planning for HNW families must move beyond product collection. You need a liquidity layer, an income layer, a growth layer, a currency layer and a succession layer. You need to know which assets can pay, which assets can be sold, which assets are merely impressive on paper, and which assets quietly expose the family to the same risk.

A large balance sheet is not a retirement system.

For anyone with RM2 million to RM10 million approaching retirement, this is the time to stress-test the structure before salary, business income or active earnings stop.

Once retirement begins, mistakes become more expensive to fix.

For anyone with RM2 million to RM10 million approaching retirement, this is the time to review whether your wealth is actually structured to pay you, protect you and outlast you.

Assets are not enough.

The structure matters.

You may be ready to stop working. But is your money ready to start paying you? Fuel supply may be stable. RON95 may stil...
28/05/2026

You may be ready to stop working. But is your money ready to start paying you? Fuel supply may be stable. RON95 may still be RM1.99. But if you are close to retirement, that should not give you too much comfort. Petrol is only one line item. Retirement has many more.

The real question is not whether Malaysia can keep one price controlled for now. The real question is whether your own monthly cashflow can survive when your salary stops, medical costs rise, groceries keep adjusting, children still need support, and your EPF or FD income does not stretch as far as expected.

That is why I read today’s business news differently.

Padini is talking about weaker consumer purchasing power. Sime Darby Property is talking about rising construction costs and cautious buyers. Healthcare groups continue to report stronger patient demand. Even when the headline says fuel supply is stable, the rest of the household cost structure is still moving.

For someone aged 55 to 60, it’s important.

At that stage, the danger is not always poverty. Many soon-to-be retirees have EPF, some FD, maybe a house, maybe investment properties, maybe insurance. From the outside, they look prepared.

But looking prepared and being cashflow-ready are two different things.

A large EPF balance can feel safe until you realise it has to fund 20 to 30 years of bills. A property can look valuable until you need monthly cash and the buyer is not there. FD can feel secure until the interest is too small to match the life you are trying to maintain.

This is why retirement planning cannot be built only around capital preservation.

It must answer a more practical question: when salary stops, what replaces it every month?

That replacement income needs structure. It needs liquidity. It needs inflation awareness. It needs healthcare reserves. It needs some global exposure so your whole retirement is not trapped inside one local cost environment.

I am not against EPF. I am not against FD. I am not against property.

I am against entering retirement with assets that look impressive but do not behave like a paycheque.

If you are within five years of retirement, this is the window to review your structure properly. Not after you retire. Not after the first medical bill. Not after you realise the FD interest is not enough.

Before. That's the key.

You are within five years of retirement. This is the time to check whether your EPF, FD, property, insurance and unit trust holdings can actually replace your salary. Contact me directly for a proper retirement cashflow review.

Malaysia’s fuel supply may be sufficient until end-July. That sounds reassuring on the surface. But for a household, sup...
26/05/2026

Malaysia’s fuel supply may be sufficient until end-July. That sounds reassuring on the surface. But for a household, supply is not the same thing as affordability. A petrol station with fuel is not much comfort if the cost of transport, food, medicine and services keeps moving quietly through the system.

The Edge CEO Morning Brief today gives a useful picture of the real pressure building underneath the headline calm. Brent crude remains elevated. Commodity shipping costs to West Asia have reportedly jumped 50% to 80%. Plantation operating costs are up 10% to 30%, while fertiliser and pesticide prices have risen sharply.

This is how shadow inflation works. It does not always arrive as one dramatic price increase. It moves through diesel, logistics, packaging, fertiliser, medical supplies, contractor costs, clinic bills and insurance assumptions. By the time the middle-class household sees it, the damage has already passed through several hands.

The healthcare signal is even cleaner. IHH says medical inflation in key markets, including Malaysia and Singapore, remains elevated, while patient fee increases are capped around 2% to 3%. That sounds comforting until you ask the obvious question: if hospital costs rise faster than patient charges, who absorbs it, for how long, and what happens when efficiency is no longer enough?

For a mid-career Malaysian, this is no longer just an investment-return question. It is a balance-sheet design question. Too much idle cash loses quietly. Too much local concentration depends on one economy, one currency, one policy path and one job market. Too much property gives comfort on paper, but not always monthly liquidity.

This is where proper wealth planning becomes less about chasing returns and more about building resilience. Emergency cash, medical reserve, global exposure, income-producing assets and a realistic retirement cashflow plan should work together.

If your money still sits in separate boxes — EPF here, FD there, property somewhere else, unit trust bought years ago and never reviewed — the issue may not be lack of assets.

It may be lack of architecture.

If your wealth plan still depends mainly on EPF, FD, property and hope, it is worth reviewing whether the structure can actually handle medical inflation, cost shocks and retirement income needs. Contact me directly if you want a proper review.

Malaysia may finally be admitting that B40, M40 and T20 are too crude to explain household stress. B40, M40 and T20 are ...
22/05/2026

Malaysia may finally be admitting that B40, M40 and T20 are too crude to explain household stress. B40, M40 and T20 are easy categories, but they do not tell you who is actually financially safe. Two families can earn the same income and live in completely different realities once housing, school fees, medical costs, ageing parents and debt repayments are counted.

That is why the latest discussion around aid eligibility matters. The government is studying a model that looks at disposable income and actual household commitments, not just income group labels. In plain English, this means the system is starting to admit what many families already know: 𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗮𝘀 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗰𝗮𝗽𝗮𝗰𝗶𝘁𝘆.

You can see the same pressure elsewhere.

Contractors say diesel has pushed construction costs up 10% to 15%, with building materials rising 20% to 30%. KPJ Healthcare reported higher profit, higher revenue, more patient activity and higher average revenue for both inpatients and outpatients. Goldman is also warning that global oil inventories are being drawn down at record pace.

This is why I keep saying official inflation is not enough for family planning.

Your retirement plan does not fail because CPI is 1.9%. It fails when medical bills, property maintenance, groceries, insurance, utilities and family support rise faster than the income engine you built. It fails when the salary stops, but the monthly commitments keep walking in like nothing changed.

For mid-career Malaysians, this is the real test. Not whether your income sounds respectable. Not whether your EPF statement looks decent. Not whether your property value went up on paper.

The question is whether your wealth can still produce income, absorb shocks and stay liquid when your commitments become heavier.

For retirees, you have the added pressure.

That is where proper portfolio architecture matters. Growth alone is not enough. Cash alone is not enough. Property alone is not enough. You need a structure that understands monthly spending, medical reserves, inflation pressure and income replacement before retirement forces the lesson on you.

When your plan only looks strong before the bills arrive, it is not a plan yet.

If your imminent retirement still depends mainly on EPF, fixed deposits, property value and hope, contact me directly. I can help you review whether your portfolio is built for monthly commitments, not just headline returns.

Most retirement projections look better than real retirement because they smooth everything out. They take messy househo...
21/05/2026

Most retirement projections look better than real retirement because they smooth everything out. They take messy household spending and turn it into annual assumptions, projected values and neat withdrawal rates. That looks organised, but it can hide the real problem. 𝘙𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺. 𝘐𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘧𝘦𝘭𝘵 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘩, 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘴𝘢𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘺 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘦.

This is the part many mid-career Malaysians still have wrong assumptions. You may have EPF, savings, unit trusts, property and insurance. You may even have a decent projected retirement number. But when salary stops, every month asks the same question: where is the cash flow coming from?

Groceries do not care about your projected portfolio value. Medical bills do not wait for your fund to recover. Insurance premiums, utilities, car repairs and family support do not arrive once a year so your spreadsheet can look tidy.

That is why retirement planning cannot only be about whether the capital is “enough”. Enough for what? Enough before healthcare, family obligations and market timing are properly tested?

A RM1 million portfolio can still create anxiety if every withdrawal feels like cutting a piece out of the future. Some retirees become afraid to spend. Others withdraw too aggressively because the bills leave them no choice. Both are planning failures, just from different directions.

The better question is not just “How much do I need to retire?”

𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘴 “𝘏𝘰𝘸 𝘮𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘩𝘭𝘺 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘮𝘺 𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘵𝘴 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘣𝘢𝘥 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴?”

That changes the discussion. It moves the focus from capital size to income design. From annual return to monthly rhythm. From paper wealth to whether the household can keep functioning when salary stops.

This matters more for mid-career professionals because your highest earning years can hide weak structure. As long as salary keeps coming in, poor income design is not obvious. The weakness only shows later, when job income disappears and the portfolio has to do the work.

By then, fixing the structure may cost more.

So yes, retirement projections are useful. But they are not enough. A projection tells you what the capital may become. A proper retirement-income review tells you whether that capital can survive real monthly life.

That is the part to check before the month checks it for you.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗳𝘂𝗹 𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 “𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝗺𝘂𝗰𝗵 𝗱𝗼 𝗜 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲?” 𝗜𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘆 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗯𝗲𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗹𝘆 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝘀𝗮𝗹𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗽𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗵𝗹𝘆 𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗻𝘂𝗲𝘀.

Medical inflation should not sit quietly inside an insurance review. That is too narrow. Once you retire, medical cost b...
21/05/2026

Medical inflation should not sit quietly inside an insurance review. That is too narrow. Once you retire, medical cost becomes a retirement planning risk because every major health event competes directly with your income, your savings, your children’s support, and your ability to stay independent.

Stay with me on this.

Sunway Healthcare recently reported higher patient volumes and revenue per inpatient admission rising 10% to RM12,458.

If you’re an investor, hooray, that looks like a growth story.

But for a retired Malaysian household, it is a warning.

This is where many retirement plans are too soft. They ask, “How much do you have?” Then everyone feels better because the number looks respectable. RM800,000. RM1 million. RM2 million. A fully paid property. Some FD. Some EPF. Maybe a bit of unit trust.

But retirement does not fail because the headline number looks small.

It fails because the structure behind the money is weak.

A retiree does not only need capital. He needs monthly income. He needs liquidity. He needs a medical reserve that does not force panic selling. He needs an investment structure that can absorb rising costs without depending entirely on children, fixed deposits, or one property sale.

Insurance matters, of course. But insurance is not the whole answer. Policies have limits, exclusions, co-insurance, repricing, room-and-board gaps, and age-related affordability issues. Even when the policy pays, the family still faces transport, recovery, follow-up treatment, caregiver costs, reduced independence, and emotional pressure.

That is why I do not like retirement planning that stops at “you are covered.”

Covered is not the same as prepared.

If your entire retirement plan depends on EPF withdrawals, FD renewals, and the hope that medical costs behave nicely, that is not planning. That is delay dressed up as prudence. The older you get, the more expensive delay becomes.

The real question is simple.

If medical and household costs rise faster than expected, does your retirement structure still produce income, preserve liquidity, and protect your dignity?

If the answer is unclear, the plan is not finished.

If you are retiring, already retired, or about to sell a property and sit on cash, this is exactly the part of the plan worth reviewing before the money becomes emotionally difficult to move.

Address

11th Floor, Menara Manulife, 6 Jalan Gelenggang, Damansara Heights
Kuala Lumpur
59100

Telephone

+60183698281

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when The Affluent Link posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to The Affluent Link:

Shortcuts

Share

Category