03/03/2016
Presumptive Taxation of Professional's Income _ Budget 2016
The proposed insertion of a new section 44ADA in the Income Tax Act 1961 is arising from the topic "Ease of Doing Business / Dispute Resolution" covered in the Budged Speech of the Finance Minister delivered on 29.2.2016.
This section has certain features like:
a. it applies to the professional mentioned u/s 44AA(1) which includes profession like legal, medical, engineering, architecture, accountancy, technical consultancy, interior decoration, authorised representatives, film artist, company secretary, information technology persons etc.
b. The assessee covered includes individual, HUF or a partnership firm (but not LLP).
c. The gross receipts of such professional should not exceed Rs. 50 lacs.
d. This section provides for a presumptive income rate minimum of 50% of the total gross receipts of the assessee in the relevant previous year.
e. The computation or applicability of this section assumes that deduction u/s 30 to 38 are already allowed to the assessee.
f. If any assessee wishes to offer lower profits he has to maintain books as per section 44AA and get them audited u/s 44AB.
Even if prima-facie intention is to provide the benefit there are certain pitfalls behind such insertion:
1. The presumptive income tax rate is not equivalent to 50% its minimum 50%.
2. Fifty percent income criteria seems to be on a higher side which means practically most of the eligible assessee's shall be subjected to tax audit compliance if they have lower real income from the profession. Thus the real intent of providing benefit does not seem to be fruitful.
3. Most of the professional firms nowadays work in a partnership firm format who now would not be eligible to claim the benefit of deduction of interest, salary, remuneration etc paid by them to their partners such kind of removal of tax benefit is a very large set back given by this Budget which was otherwise permitted till date. Certain voice must be raised on this point for necessary changes because when a firm claims the deduction for the payment made by it to its partners, such partners respectively offer such receipts in their personal hands. It may be noted that respective amendment is not proposed u/s 28(v) which may still attract taxation in the hands of respective partner.
Readers of this post may also share their valuable opinion in the matter. Thanks.